High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/373/2010allowed

Dr. Bahadur Singh Marko v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-10-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 373 of 2010 • Dr. Bahadur Singh Marko S/o Chhattar Singh Marko, aged about 43 years, R/o Village Badekilepal, Block Bastanar, Distt.-Bastar (CG). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh through the Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (CG).

2. High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director, Adim Jati Anusandhan Evam Prashikshan Sansthan, State Of Chhattisgarh, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Premises, Raipur (CG).

3. Deputy Director High Level Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Chhattisgarh, Regional Unit (Kshetriya Ekai) Jagdalpur, Distt.-Bastar (CG)

4. Sub Divisional Officer, Jagdalpur, District Bastar (CG).

5. Secretary, Family Welfare & Health Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (CG).

---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Vaibhav A Gowardhan, Advocate.

For Respondent/State Shri Raj Kumar Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 01/10/2015

1. The Petitioner seeks to impugn order (Annexure P/1) whereby the Respondent No.3 has refused to conduct inquiry in respect of social status of the Petitioner on the ground that Petitioner was originally the resident of Madhya Pradesh and which now is beyond the jurisdiction of the Respondent No.3 so far as the verification of the caste of the Petitioner is concerned.

2. The State in its reply in para-7 has categorically stated that in the event if the Respondent No.2 and 3 are directed for verification of the social status of the Petitioner, the same would be honoured by them.

3. In the light of above submission made by the State counsel in its reply in para-7, impugned order (Annexure P/1) is quashed and the Respondent No.3 is directed to forward the request of the Petitioner to the Respondent No.2 for verification of social status of the Petitioner.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the Writ Petition stands allowed. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P.Sam Koshy) JUDGE inder