High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/18/2018disposed off

Jagnarayan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.18 of 2018

1. Jagnarayan Son Of Late Manbodh, Aged About 57 Years R/o Village Dandgaon, P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

2. Jagat Ram, Son Of Late Sukhram, Aged About 78 Years R/o Village Dandgaon, Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sobhit Netam, Son Of Late Mantri Netam, Aged About 77 Years R/o Village Dandgaon, Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4. Dilip Singh, Son Of Parshuram Singh, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Dandgaon, Police Station And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector, Surguja, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer/ Land Acquisition Officer, Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar Udaipur, Tahsil Udaipur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh.

5. The National Highway Authority Raipur, National Highway No. 130, Bilaspur, - Ambikapur Road

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, (P. W. D. ), Udaipur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents : Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Dy.G.A. & Mr. Rahim Ubwani, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 08/01/2018

(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' land has been acquired by respondents No.2 to 5 for construction of the road, but in lieu of which no compensation has been paid to the petitioners, against which they have made representation before respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till this date, hence this petition. (2) Be that as it may, respondent No.2-Collector, Surguja is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioners strictly in accordance with law expeditiously within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-