Somaru Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.59 of 2018

1. Somaru Ram S/o Late Dadai Ram Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Gumga Post Dandgaon P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

2. Bhola Ram S/o Late Boudha Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Gumga Post Dandgaon P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

3. Subhas Chandra S/o Late Baldev Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Gumga Post Dandgaon P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur, District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

4. Sant Bilash S/o Late Suikhram Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Gumga Post Dandgaon P. S. And Tahsil Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secrertary, Department Of Revenue Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector Surguja District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer / Land Acquisition Officer Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

4. The Tahsildar Udaipur Tahsil Udaipur District Surajpur Chhattisgarh.

5. The National Highway Authority Raipur National Highway No. 130 Bilaspur Ambikapur Road.

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, (P. W. D. ) Udaipur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 10/01/2018

(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners' land has been acquired by respondent authorities, but in lieu of which neither land has been given nor compensation has been paid to them, against which they have made representation before the respondent authorities, but the same has not been considered and decided till now and, therefore, direction may be issued to the said authority to decide the same expeditiously. (2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(3) Be that as it may, the Collector, Surguja is directed to consider and decide the petitioners' representation in accordance with law after hearing the parties expeditiously within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-