Smt. Dhanmati Bai v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4121 of 2012 Smt. Dhanmati Bai, W/o. Late Budhram Singh, Aged about 61 years, R/o. Village Putuwa, Post Tuman Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, through: Secretary Department of Janpad Panchayat, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Sarangarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

4. Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts & Pension, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. The Accountant General, Pension, Office Pandari, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

None For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 :

Mr. Pawan Shrivastava, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/05/2018

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction for release of the GPF amount as well as pension.

2. The respondents subsequent to the filing of the writ petition have come up with documents whereby it reflects that petitioner has been paid the retiral dues and PPO also has been issued for the release of pension to the petitioner vide Annexure R/1 filed along with the reply.

3. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the opinion that since the grievance of the petitioner stands completely redressed; nothing further remains to be adjudicated.

4. The present writ petition accordingly stands disposed off.

5. However, still in case if there is any further unpaid dues payable to the petitioner, she would be at liberty to move an appropriate representation before the competent authority, who would ensure that the representation is decided on merits.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved