Puran Chand Hota v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.77 of 2018 Puran Chand Hota S/o Late Shri Kanhu Prasad Hota Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Chouranga, Tahsil Lalunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Food, Civil Supplies And Consumer Protection Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. , Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector , Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub Divisional Officer R Sub Division , Lailunga , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

4. Primary Agriculture Credit Co - Operative Society , Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Rajpur Through Its Manager Tahsil Lailunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Harihar Prasad Hota S/o Late Kanhu Prasad Hota R/o Village Chouranga Tahsil Lalunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

6. Satyakam Hota S/o Late Kalachand Hota R/o Village Chouranga Tahsil Lalunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

7. Damrudhar Hota S/o Late Mahadeo Hota R/o Village Chouranga Tahsil Lalunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

8. Parmanand Hota S/o Late Lochan Prasad Hota R/o Village Chouranga Tahsil Lalunga District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. , District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. J.N. Nande, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dilman Rati Minj, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

11/01/2018 (1) The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 12.12.2017 passed by the Collector, Raigarh by which Collector has allowed the petitioner and his brother/nephew to sell their crops (paddy) to Sewa Sahakari Samiti Limited to the extent of which they had sown crops on the lands held by them.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that impugned order is unsustainable and bad in law. (3) After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that factual dispute is involved, the petitioner is allowed to make representation to the Commissioner, Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur against the order of Collector within a period of 15 days from today. If such representation is filed by the petitioner before the Commissioner, in that event Commissioner shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of representation.

(4) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-