← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPCR/28/2013dismissed

Narad Lal Chandrawanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-09-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPCR No. 28 of 2013 Narad Lal Chandrawanshi, S/o Muniram Chandrawanshi, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bitkuli, P.S.- Pipariya, Tahsil- Kawardha, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.) 2.

Director General of Police Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3.

Superintendent of Police, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) 4.

Station House Officer, Police Station- Pipariya, DistrictKabirdham (C.G.) 5.

Vikas, S/o Vishnu Sharan, aged about 32 years. 6.

Vishnu Sharan, S/o Dukhu Ram, aged about 65 years. 7.

Bhagwati Bai, W/o Vishnu Sharan, aged about 50 years. 8.

Sati, S/o Vishnu Sharan, aged about 30 years. Respondent No. 5 to 8 are R/o Village- Khamhi, Police Station- Pipariya, District- Kabirdham (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate.

For State/resp. 1 to 4 :

Mr. Uddhav Sharma, Govt. Advocate For resp. No. 5 to 8 :

Mr. Akash Agrawal, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Sandeep Shrivastava, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order On Board 07/09/2021 1.

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. praying that the investigation may be carried out by the CBI.

2.

The State has filed return on 23.08.2013. During pendency of this petition, the investigating authority after investigation, has submitted final report before the Fast Track Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Sessions Trial No. 04/2014 (State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Vikas Chandravanshi) in

which, the respondent has been convicted vide order dated 19.01.2015 for committing offence punishable under Sections 304-B of I.P.C. for life imprisonment and also imposed penalty of Rs. 25,000/-.

3.

Since, the accused has already been convicted by the Court below, there is nothing to be determined by this Court at this stage.

4.

In view of the subsequent development, the present petition has become infructuous.

5.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

6.

Copy of the dated 19.01.2015 passed by Fast Track Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Sessions Trial No. 04/2014 (State of Chhattisgarh Vs. Vikas Chandravanshi) is taken on record.

Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Arun