D.P.Pandey v. State

IN THE MP. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIB

x '

- RAIPUR Wg 'Q'Wlbi ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.

'1'

';

l I).

APPHCANT '.

DWARPAL PRASAD PANDE (Ex. U.D'T.

previously appointed on adhoc basis) S/O SHRI RAS BlHARl PANDE AGED ABOUT 36,YEARS, R/O -VILLAGE POST- TORESINGHA, TAH. - SARAIPALI , DISTT. - RAIPUR (M.P.)

VERSUS

NON-APPLICANT/ :

(1) RESPONDENTS STATE OF M.P.. THROUGH COLLECTOR, RAIPUR, DISTT. RAIPUR (M.P.) COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, GOVERNMENT OF M.P., DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION (DPI OFFICE) NEAR CHETAK BRIDGE, BHOPAL (M.P.) JOINT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, EDUCATION DNI'RAIPUR, EDUCATION. DEPTT.

(3) P.O. RAIPUR M.P.

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINSITRATIVE TRIBUNAL ACT, 1985 (N0.13 OF 1985) READ WITH ARTICLES 14 & 16 9F THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA u

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH BILASPUR WPS No. 2400 of 2005 - Dwarpal Prasad Pande ---- Petitioner

Versus

- State -'--- Respondent For Petitioner .

None For Respondents-State :

Shri PK Bhaduri, GA for the State Hon'ble ShriJustice 'Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 31l03l201 6 1.

Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution. 2.

Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- '

Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Ash'u