← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/230/2010infructuous

Dr.Neeta Shrivastava v. M.K.Raut And Others

2015-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

;/'. ^.

^^/ !N THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (C.G.l CONTEMPT CASE (C} N0. ^ S^ / 2010 ^.

(N THIE IVIATTER QF ANDBETWEEN :

PETITIONER PETITIONER Dr. Neeta Shrivastava, wife of Dr. Sushil Shrivastava, aged about years, resident of Agya Nagar, Near Park, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh w .^^^ -:.y^^"

VERSUS

^""

RBSRONDENT 1.

tShri M.K. Raut, son of not known to the petitioner, age not known to the petitioner, Secretary-CumCommissioner, Department of Higher Education, Govt.

of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.

Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2.

Shri J.S. Dixit, son of not known to ^ the petitioner, age not known to the ^ 'C_ petitioner, Deputy Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Govt.

of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S.

Bhawan, Mantrataya, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Shri Onkar Singh, son of not known to the petitioner, age not known to the petitioner, Additional Director, Directorate of Higher Education, Govt.

of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4.

Dr S.J. Kekare, son of not known to the petitioner, age not known to the petitioner, Principal, New Govt.

College, Rajpur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh CQNTEIVIPT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF IA. ftlAD WITR SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPTOFCQURtS 191'1. F£iR INITIATING CONTEMPT PRlOCEEDINGS AGAINST THE g^PC)hlt)ENT 7 ^ONTEMNOR FORBREACH AND DISOBEDIENCE OF W^R DATED 09.07.2010 & 13,08.2010 PASSED IN W.P.(S) N0. 3384/2010 ^AS^EDBYTHlSHQN'BLECOURT

~5^S( ^WW^, W^WW, Rldl'My HI'Hdl ^RT^ f^.GQ^.-^^^.A/p.-..^3^.'^ 201^ 3TT^lJ^ ( ^I^^ ) ^T^T^T R^i^) chl^I<?l4)v1Hl^cfl^^l<;l<Rl<^l< ^stf^m^T^r ^TTW^f^T^I^r wn^T^r^FOT^ S.B: HON'BLEJUSTICEMR.S 07-05-2015:

^NJAYK. AGRAWAL Shri NimishKiranSharmaj Shri Pawan Shrivastava,c| 1 counsel for the petitioner.

punsel for the respondens.

Counsel for the petitionej |submits that with the passage of time this contempt case has becd)me infructuous. Accordingly, the contem |)t case is dismissed as havit become infructuous.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge ^ s ^RToftq ^uild-4, ^ra^- FS/1-7/2014-2,00,000.