High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/155/2019disposed off

Vasundhara Jan Kalyan Samiti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 155 of 2019

1. Vasundhara Jan Kalyan Samiti Through: Gaurav Shrivastava S/o R.K. Shrivastava,aged 30 years, secretary Vasundhara Jan Kalyan Samiti, R/o House No. 163, Ganesh Dada Gali, Bhatti Raod Kedarpur, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, District- Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. District Program Officer, Women And Child Development Department Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Petitioners Shri N. K. Sinha, Advocate For Respondent- State Shri Sanjay Agrawal, GA Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

21/01/2019

1. By the impugned order, the petitioner has been asked to vacate the present premises where the open shelter home is run by it for which permission was granted on 05/08/2015 and thereafter registration was allowed on 03/01/2018. By notice dated 06/09/2018, 06/10/2018, 24/10/2018 and 29/11/2018, the petitioner was directed to shift to another accommodation to

continue to run the shelter home. However, despite submitting undertaking that search for new premises is going on and as soon as he will find the new premises, shifting would be done, the petitioner has not been able to find out the new premises.

2. Considering the fact that while replying to the first notice dated 06/09/2018, the petitioner had submitted to the District Programme Officer by his letter dated 19/09/2018, as referred in Annexure-P-3, for shifting the premises and it is not a case where the impugned action has been taken unilaterally without hearing the petitioner, ends of justice would be served if the petitioner is allowed 6 weeks further time to shift to the new premises, failing which the Authorities would be at liberty to take measures in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge Vijay