← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/5132/1996dismissed

Sarjoo Singh v. The State Of M.P.

2015-02-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JI^ICAT^E AT JABALPUR M«P<

1KIT PETITIOH m. --OF 1996» (©therthanservtce matter) EBTmONER ss SARJOO SINGH, son of Shri Nandlal aged about 52 yea.rs y R/o Butvahi Tahsil Lundra, Bistts Sarguja M«P«

Versus

KBSPOKDEWS 1.

THB STAIS OF M.P» Thr@ugfa Secretary, Bepartmeat ©1 C©rporationVallabh Bhawan Bfaopal M.P, 2< Begistrar/Commissioi^r, C©-@perativsSocieties, M.P* Viodhyachaal Bhawan, Bhepal.

3» M.PoRajya Sahkari Vipaan Sangh, Maryadit Ni&^r P •H.Q. Jahagirabad , Bhopal. M.P.

4« Shri R.B.Batti, Electioa Officer, M.P.Rajya sahkari Vipnan Sangh Mar^it, Efear PHQ Jahagiraba<3^^i||al, j '"

<"-<-^,.'^

^.^•it-^-^r-^-^ '^ ^ <• o * < < ^ • - 5» Guaga Sabji Ful, Phool Utpadak Marke-btag aGd c@-©perativeSocieties, Odiki District Sarguja M.P.

6.

Jawafaar Sabji Ful Ph@@l Utpadak, Marketlog aad cooperative Societtes, Odiki District Pra'bapptar M.P.

^ Kishaa Sab^i Ful, Pho©l^fcpadak, IBarketing and cooperatiye Socteties, Vip&an atid Pr^crtye Sabkari Samiti, Surajpur* M»P» ( 8.

Adarsb Sabji Pul Phool Utpadak Vipaaia aad Prakriya Sahkari, Samiti, Baikunthpur • M.P.

9.

BajeevSabjt Ful Pbool Utpadak, '- Vipaan aad prakriya Sahkari Samiti- \ Bhaitdaa, '

10.

Paryavaraa Sanrashak Vraksha R©paQ, Ful and Sakb Sab^i Utpadak Sabkari S@niti Ambikapur M.P.

'/ IStlT PETITION U ER MTICLE 226/227 ©FTHE CONgriTUTIGN OF INDIA

f'tT^h..

^v, "

^I-HC-78 s^;"\ li'

'3^3 ^^ici^, ^Tll^Ko, flr?frapy WTO1 sRHNi..%?..,S.l52,/..'3:&...^ 201 CT^I ^l^ ( ^I^qy ) ^ ()'

?hl^[d41^ ^Wdl'?'f^<ft^^'< '^3TRm^T^r CT^r'^T^TT^) ^TrSR^rf^^n^r ^nw^^-Hish SB:HON'BLE SHRI_JUSTICE SANJ 25.02.2015 •Y K.

AGRAWAL None for the petitionerl Shri SP Kale, Deputy A4vocate General for the Ptate.

The matter was called for . hearing twice.

On both the occasions, non^ appeared nor any cepresentation;

was made on behalf of the petitioner.

The petitioner m^-y not be interested in t;he matter.

In view of the above, t|he matter is dismissed |:or want of prosecution.

Sd/- SanjayK.Agrawal Judge inder