← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3227/2005non prosecution

Devendra Singh Thakur v. State Of M.P.And ORS.

2016-04-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

BEFORE THEM.P. STATE ADMINISTRATT^E TRIBUNAL '

BENGHATRAIPUR O.A.No.%>G of2005^ Devendra Smgh Thakur Aged 42 years, GramSahayak, Block Development Unit, Katghora District KorbaM.P.

APPLICANT

VERSUS

1.

StateofMadliyaPradesh ThroughPrihcipal Seeretary Panchayat & Samajsewa Vibhag VallabhBhawan, Bllopal (M.P.) 2- • :Jomt®ireetor.:•.'.. .'

.

•.

!

: '.'

/.' 1.1 Panchayat^ Sauiajsewa Vibhag, BilaspurDivision, T Bilaspur, M.P. (Ncm'abolished:after ^ promulgationcifJila^ai'^arSiicfhasbeenmerged wK^^ Qffice of^.lpsanehalskSaimg SewaVibhdg BilS^ur, here-inympleaSeSWK^RespondentNo. 3 i*~ ^s?

3DeputyDirreGtor ganchayataadSaEuajSewaVibhag, '^^^Bilaspur Diyision, BUaspur Dist. Bilaspur M.P.

ss 4.

TheDirectorPanchayatAvam Samaj Sewa, Tulsi Bhawaa Bhopal(M.P.) RESPONDENTS APPLICATIONUNDERSEC'riON190FTHEADMINISTSATrVE TRIBtINALAGT. 1985 1 TAILS OFTHEAPPLICATION PAKnCULARSOFTHEAPPLICANT Aspercausetille ian 11^^111;

aa .:il lu.B.l.i

3^ NAFR HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WPSNo.^227 QL2005 Devendra Singh Thakur -- Petitioner

Versus

• StateOfM.P.And Ors.

-- Respondent For Petitioner None Hon'ble^hri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra OrderOn Board 13/04/2016 Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd//- prashantKumarMishra Judge Nirala Tliirnr"l'i!