M/S P.D. Agrawal v. State Of C.G. And ORS.

'5 mg:%% mvkm af;

(33%) of: W/ /

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

Ciéw WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2010 PETITIONER MIS. P.D.AGRAWAL THROUGH ITS PARTNER, SURENDRA KUMAR AGRAWAL, SON OF LATE SHRI s.B.AGRAWAL, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF DHILLON COMPLEX, JAWAHAR NAGAR, RAIPUR (CO)

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, THROUGH IT'S THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, DKs EHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) / 2.

THE ENGINEER - IN - CHIEF, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, SIRPUR BHAWAN, RAIPUR (C.G.) /3.

CHIEF ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, RAIPUR ZONE, RAIPUR (C.G.) ,4.

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, f/ BIMISION NO.

1, RAIPUR (C.G.) WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI MANDAMUS ORDER OR ORDERS DIRECTION OR DIRECTIONS OR THE LIKE

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DB HON BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & HON BLE SHRI P SAM KOSHY J Writ Petition (C) No 7691 of 2010 w Petitioner M/s. P,D. Agrawal '

VERSUS

State of Chhattisgarh and others agpgrm-nts

Present:

Shn Anand Kesarwani counsel for the petitioner Shrl Prafull N Bharat Addl A G for the State

ORDER

(5"' Of February,r201 5) Per Navin Sinha, Acting c'hief'Justice, After some argument, learned counsel for the Petitioner prays for leave to withdraw the Writ Petition for availing remedies before the Arbitral Tribunal against the order dated 7.4.2010. 2.

Learned oounsel for the State raises objection with regard to the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal.

3.

These are matter/s/r-tqwbe qonsidered by the Tribunal itself in accordance with law as and when the Petitioner files such application. The Writ Petition is dismissed as Withdrawn With that liberty .

» ;

j Sd/- SM P. Sam Koshy '

, Judge Acting Chief Justice