K K Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 318 of 2019 K. K. Mishra S/o Shri Jayasi Lal Mishra, Aged About 59 Years, Working As Executive Engineer, Office Of Superintending Officer, Water Resources Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh. District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Water Resources Chhattisgarh Raipur, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Collector, District North Bastar Kanker, Government Of Chhattisgarh
3. Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources Department Raipur, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. Superintending Engineer, Department Of Water Resources, Kanker Indravati Project Block, Jagdalpur
5. A. K. Nath, Executive Engineer, Office Of Superintending Officer, Water Resources Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh. District North Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Amit Kumar Chaki, Advocate For State :
Ms. Astha Shukla, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/01/2019
1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is that working on the post of Executive Engineer under the respondents the petitioner was transferred from Durg to Kanker vide order dated 05.10.2018. The petitioner duly complied with the order and joined at the transferred place Kanker on 10.10.2018. Though the petitioner has
-2joined his duty since 10.10.2018 at Kanker, according to the petitioner, till date he has not been handed over with the charge of Executive Engineer nor has he been paid salary since then.
2. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this Court does not intend to keep the writ petition pending rather ends of justice would meet if the respondent no.1 is directed to ensure that the order of transfer which has been complied with is implemented in its letter and spirit particularly when the petitioner has reported for duty on 10.10.2018. Moreover, respondent no.1 shall also ensure that the petitioner is paid the salary since October, 2018 onwards in accordance with law at the earliest preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai