← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2990/2013disposed off

Ku.Rama Nishad v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2021-10-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.2990 of 2013 Ku.Rama Nishad daughter of Shivshankar Nishad, aged about 32 years, resident of near Pt. Munnalal School, Gondpara, Bilaspur, Police Station-City Kotwali, Civil & Revenue District-Bilaspur (CG) ----Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, P.S.-Rakhi, District-Raipur (CG)

2. The Director General of Police, Chhattisgarh Police Headquarter Civil Lines, Raipur (CG)

3. The Police Inspector General (Selection), Chhattisgarh Police Headquarter Civil Lines, Raipur (CG)

4. The Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Tarun Dadsena, Advocate For Respondents : Mr.Siddharth Dubey, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 05.10.2021

1. Mr.Tarun Dadsena, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that though Lalit Nishad to whom compassionate appointment was given has died and the petitioner has made an application for compassionate appointment as per policy, which has not been considered and decided till this date.

2. On the other hand, Mr.Siddharth Dubey, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the respondents/State, would

submit that if fresh representation is made by the petitioner within 3 weeks from today that will be considered and decided by the respondents as per relevant rules applicable at the time of death of Lalit Nishad.

3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is allowed to make fresh application / representation for compassionate appointment within 3 weeks from today. If such an application / representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondents authorities within 4 weeks from its receipt and to pass a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.

4. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the writ petition finally stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K.Agrawal) Judge B/-