Smt. Rupwati Tokal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 803 of 2021 Smt. Rupwati Tokal W/o Shri Arvind Mashis Aged About 30 Years Patwari, P.H. No. 12, Badetungali, Post, Thana And Tahsil- Bhairamgarh, DistrictBijapur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Revenue And Calamity Management, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector Bijapur, District- Bijapur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Dy. AG Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/02/2021 1.

Counsel for the petitioner prays that he shall remove the default during the course of the day.

2.

As prayed for, the petitioner is permitted to carry out default during the course of the day itself.

3.

With the consent of the parties, matter was heard and disposed of on admission stage.

4.

The limited relief that the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for considering his representation so far as transferring the petitioner from the scheduled area to a non-scheduled area. 5.

According to the petitioner, she has been working in a scheduled area for last more than 10 years and has been approaching the

authorities considered for a suitable transfer in a non-scheduled area.

6.

Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, the writ petition stands disposed of at this juncture directing the respondent No.1 to consider the grievance of the petitioner and to take appropriate steps in accordance with the Rules and Policies governing the field at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

7.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as entitlement of the petitioner for relief that he has sought for, the authorities concerned shall decide it purely taking into consideration the policies as also when administrative exigency arises. 8.

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit