Chhattisgarh Mool Anusuchit Jati Adhikari/Karmachari Sangh And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ANR.

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (PIL) No. 70 of 2013

1. Chhattisgarh Mool Anusuchit Jati Adhikari/Karmachari Sangh A Society registered under the Chhattisgarh Societies Registration Act, 1973 having Registration No. Chhattisgarh State 1849and having its Head Office At House No. EWS 248, New Rajendra Nagar, Sector 7, Katora Talab, Post Ravi Gram, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, Distt. Raipur, C.G. Through Shri P.L. Patle. S/o Sunderlal Patle, Aged About 55 Yrs. President, C.G. Mool Anusuchit Jati Adhikari/Karmachari Sangh, R/o House No. EWS 248, New Rajendra Nagar, Sector 7, Katora Talab, Post Ravi Gram, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur, C.G., Chhattisgarh

2. Shri R.L. Bhatt, S/o Shri Mauji Ram, Aged About 64 Years Member, C.G. Mool Anusuchit Jati Adhikari/Karmchari Sangh, R/o D/111, Guru Ghashidas Colony, New Rajendra Nagar, Distt. Raipur C.G., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Union Of India Through The Secretary, To The Govt. of India Ministry of Social Justice And Empowerment A-Wing, Shastri Bhavan, At New Delhi ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Rakesh Dubey, Advocate.

For Respondent/State : Shri A.S. Kachhawaha, Additional Advocate General. For Respondent No.2 : Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General. Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Pritinker Diwaker, Judge Order on Board 09/07/2018 Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 1.

Heard counsel for the parties.

2.

Read the materials brought on record to the challenge which has been made to Annexure P/1 to Annexure P/4. Since Annexure P/4 is the Rule which is

also a subject matter for challenge made by the Petitioners who are said to be a Registered Society, this Public Interest Litigation is dismissed. If any individual is aggrieved by the operation of the impugned Rule, he has freedom to approach the Court individually. The collective challenge of such kind gives the Court a feeling that there seems to be some political agenda behind such challenge rather than genuine concern with regard to the interest group for whose cause the Petitioners are trying to fight.

3.

The petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Pritinker Diwaker) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE Anu