Ramkumar Rajwade v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 359 of 2020 • Ramkumar Rajwade S/o Shri Bisheshwar Prasad Rajwade Aged About 55 Years R/o Irrigation Colony, Darri, Tahsil Katghora, Police Station Darri, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Engineer-In-Chief Department Of Water Resources, Sihawa Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Engineer Minimata Bango Project, Department Of Water Resources, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Executive Engineer Hasdeo Barage Water Management, DivisionRampur, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents :

Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 17.01.2020

1. Heard.

2. Grievance of the petitioner, as ventilated through this petition is that even though the petitioner is continuing as daily wage employee since long, his claim for regularization has not been decided till date. It is submitted that though the petitioner was terminated in the year 1995, award of reinstatement was passed in his favour by the Labour Court in the year 2013 with the legal consequence that the petitioner shall be deemed to be in service from the initial date of appointment in the year 1989.

3. If the case of the petitioner is considered treating his initial date of appointment as in the year 1989, he would be entitled to be

considered for regularization under circular dated 05/03/2008 issued for consideration of cases of regularization pursuant to direction of the Supreme Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka and others Vs. Uma Devi (3) and others, 2006 (4) SCC 1 for consideration of cases of those, who have completed 30 years of service.

4. After going through the records and orders passed by the Labour Court, it is quite clear that the effect of the order would be that the petitioner shall be deemed to be in service without any break. This would entitle the petitioner for due consideration for regularization under circular dated 05/03/2008. It is ordered accordingly.

5. Let the case of the petitioner be considered by a duly constituted Committee as per policy dated 05/03/2008 and a decision be taken within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge yasmin