← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4340/2005non prosecution

Meghnath Singaur v. State

2016-04-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

BEFORE HON'BLE V.P.

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BENCH AT RAEUR (mm;

wW LQHg££ 0.A.

NO.

------------ /200l Fixed for ................

Meghnath Singaur S/o Sri Gajlal Singaur Revenue Inspector Settlement Office, RAIPUR (Chhattisgarh) AEEt"l mmg

Versus

The State of Chhattisgarh Through :

The Principél Secretary Revenue Department Secretariate D.K.S.

Bhavan G.E.

Road, RAIPUR (C.G.) The Collector District DURG (C.G.) (2) The Commissioner Land Records and Settlement RAIPUR (c. G.

) (8) The Collector District Raiour RAIPUR (C.G.) (4) The Settlement Officer RAIPUR (0.6;) (5) NON-APPLICANTS.

a CATIUN UNDER SECTION 19 OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL APPLE S l ACT, 1985.

The applicant, most humbly, begs to submit as under:_ Particulars of the aoplicant are as shown in the

k NAFR @ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4340 of 9m;

- Meghnath Singaur ---- Petitioner

Versus

-~-- Respondent I For Petitioner '

~ None For Respondent/State Shri P.K. Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate '_ Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Shri Ju L Order On Board 08/04/201 6 1) The matter was passed over once in absence of any representation on behalf'ofihe p'etftioner.I No one appears for the petitioner even in the second caii.

2) in the circumstances, there is, no other option left with the Court, but to dismiss the petition forwant of prosecution. 3).

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for vvantwgt prosecution.

{TWV'HFEdIrr s i i t \ Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra