← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/3637/2003dismissed

Anita Kujur And Others v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2014-01-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nawal Kishore Agarwal3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

^3(y^

IN THE HIGH OQURT OF JUDICAIURfi ©F GHHATXSQARH AT BILASPUR

w.

p.. N© ?36'^>7A3 P'ETITIONERS •)g] Anita Kujuar daughter of KaushalGhandra aged 20 years resident of Xndranager post Fundyldihari Ambikapui^'^dhsil Ambikapur District Sarg.uja .C.G.

.

w 2S Anil Kumar Tirkey son of shri Karlman T*( wcyiK7 .18 Tirkey age.d 21 years resident of Shivdhar£| celoney Anbi.kapur Tahsll tobikapur Bts'tiie'fcj BViSSS CleiV.top'

""

Sarguja C,G, 3.

.Sunil Kumar Ekka son df shrt Jadvir Ekka aged 24 ye^ars resident of Namnakala ward Ambikapur tahsil Ambikapur District SargHJi . C.G.

yEBSUS_ '

1.

State ef Oihatisgarh threugh Secrel-ary BESPGNDENTS ^'

Higher Eduoatien Depai-tment D.K^hawan Raa^iur.'

^••y ^%<^.*'

/y'<^''^s^''

^.y^ d "^""

&..

BIft^et©r ef Highei Educa-tion i3ep,artmept ef Ghhatisgarh Gevt'Q.KSBhawan Raipuro &ftv CellecteB Sarguja Ambikapur 4»' PrineipaA' Post 6Eadua'b& .Qeilage Aaabi.feaRur'! i •'.•''

.

_ '• '

.•.•".'

...-':."

'

• '

'

-,-'.'~.?..''-[: f5~^?..

.

'.

.; :r-'-:'.-'^ i.^s:":.: .•-:'j:

Distrtct, Sas'guja1.'

i' -^- s"^^^^ ^ .^ prineipa^'QBvt.Col^ge^^P^ Say^-ujci -H<a8w

s/

6. Principal Qovt College Ramanujganj Dist-t Sarguja ".

T. Prineipal Govt Gollege Wadr^f NNager Bistt sarguja ., miT PETITICN UNDER ARTIGLE 226/227 O? Tffi- CONSTITUTKai OF .INDIA FOR ISSUWCE OF miT IN THE NATURE MANAMUS eERTIORARI ANO FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR WRITS ORDER OR_ DIRECTIC .QR DIRECTIQUS .

K;

R

•^v 75T'<ii<ii<n<<,yal'y'ic, (siMi'H'j,< f «Jo. ^fe^^/03 >p WWIT tl»*11<t> Sf^t Jf^l (iqllt^T) '+l<<(ff4-ti|l*<df'? 'fs'st ifatSK ^T3ifgiTant?i sn^i ^H (<•<!<* 'cWT 311^51 stxfl^i ¥«in;Ryf^fl <»fi^<l S.B.: Hoa'ble Mr. Justice LK, Aearwai 01.01.2014 Couiisel Mr. J.S. Baraik, for the petitioners.

iastructions itt fhe matter.

Mr. Baraik pleads nc| In view of fhe abovej this Court is left wifh no ofher option except to disiuii s the petition for want of prosecution.

Accordiagly, tfae wri^ petition is disinissed for waat ofprosecution. NQordera^ to costs.

Sd/- N.K.Agrawal Judge Shyna 511tl<£l-l|^jli|t^u||^(R^f^t^-PS/48-8/2012-80,000.