Ashok Kumar Deshmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3097 of 2016 • Ashok Kumar Deshmukh S/o Shri Anand Rao Deshmukh, Aged About 53 Years R/o H-19, Nagar Nigam Colony, Korba, District Korba, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Through: Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indravati Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, P.S. Rakhi, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For State :

Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General For Corporation :

Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/07/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue with regard to inclusion of the period of service rendered in SADA, Korba for the purposes of pensionary benefit has been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 (Narayan Prasad Dewangan Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others) and batch of petitions decided on 08.02.2016. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner's case is also squarely covered by the same judgment.

2.

Learned counsel for the Corporation does not dispute the legal position.

3.

In view of the above, the petition is also disposed off on similar terms and with a direction to grant the same benefit to the petitioner subject to verification of factual aspect. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra