High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPL/2/2013disposed off

Saminuddin Ahmad v. Union Of India And ORS.

2015-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (L) No.2 of 2013 Saminuddin Ahmad, S/o Sarif Uddin Ahmad, Aged about 53 years, Sub-Area of SECL Chirimiri UG, Distt.Korea (CG) ---Petitioner

Versus

1. Union of India, Through: Secretary, Ministry of Labour, Shram Shakti Bhawan, New Delhi.

2. The Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Torwa, Bilaspur (CG)

3. Presiding Officer Labour Court, Bilaspur (CG) ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.

For Res. No.1 and 2 :

Mr. N.K.Vyas, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 09/12/2015 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that issue raised in this writ petition is squarely covered by a decision rendered in W.P. (L) No.181 of 2012 (Subodh Shrivastava v. Union of India & others), in which this Court has disposed of the writ petitions in following terms:- "15. After hearing counsel for the parties, this Court is of the opinion that since the application filed by the Coal India i.e. holding company of SECL claiming exemption under Section 36 of the ID Act from constituting works committee under Section 3 of the ID Act is pending consideration before the appropriate govt. i.e. Union of India, the same has to be decided by the respondent No.1-Union of India in accordance with law, therefore, it would be expedient to

dispose of all these writ petitions relating to exemption u/s 36-B of the ID Act. Accordingly, it is directed that respondent No.1 shall take decision on the said application expeditiously. It is further directed that till that application is finally decided, no coercive steps shall be taken against these writ petitioners.

16. With the aforesaid observations, all the writ petitions stand finally disposed of in terms indicated hereinabove." 2.

Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of paragraph 15 and 16 of the order passed in the matter of Subodh Shrivastava (supra). No order as to cost(s). 3.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-