High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/402/2020disposed off

Karam Chand Gendle v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 402 of 2020 Karam Chand Gendle Son Of Shri Shilau Ram Gendle Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.) Government Higher Secondary School Bartori, Block - Bilha, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director Of Panchayat Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Pandey, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Kunal Das, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 17.01.2020

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents whereby the petitioner has not been granted increment on the ground that he has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions vide order dated 03.11.2017) and

various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and to take appropriate decision thereon subject to his completing the requisite length of service.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE y a s m I n `