High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/386/2019disposed off

Dr. Digeshvar Kumar Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 386 of 2019 Dr. Digeshvar Kumar Kashyap S/o Late Shri K.N. Kashyap Aged About 56 Years R/o Civil Line, Quarter No. G/31, Mahurband Para, Kanker, Police Station Tahsil And District - Kanker Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, Office Of Directorate, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Indrawati Bhawan, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Commissioner, Office Of Commissioner, Jagdalpur, District - Bastar Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Pandey, Advocate along with Mr. Santosh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arvind Dubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/01/2019

1. The petitioner in the present writ petition is assailing the order of transfer imposed about 1 1⁄2 years back i.e. on 12.08.2017. Vide the said order the petitioner stood transferred from Kanker to Narayanpur.

2. According to the petitioner, till date he has not complied with the order and has been repeatedly approaching the authorities by repeated representations for either recalling the order of transfer or posting him in a non-schedule area.

3. This Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition at this stage, particularly when the impugned order under challenge is an order passed about 1 1⁄2 years back. Though this Court is reluctant to entertain the writ petition, would not by itself preclude the petitioner from approaching the

-2authorities for redressal of his grievance. It appears that the petitioner has made repeated representations for change of place of posting or cancellation of the transfer order. The respondent authorities till date has not taken a decision.

4. Given the said facts, let the respondents No.1 & 2 take an appropriate decision on the representations of the petitioner, which are pending consideration before the authorities, within an outer limit of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved