← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/1706/2002non prosecution

Ram Lal Raj And ORS. v. U.O.I.And ORS.

2016-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker1 pages

\Glo NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 1706 of 2002 1.

Ramlal Raj, son of Shri Boloram Raj, aged about 33 years, resident of village Bachhali Khurd, P.0. Bhaisajhar, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Bilaspur Zilla Aupcharikettar Shiksha Sangh through its President Ramlal Raj son of Shri Boloram Raj aged about 33 years, resident of village Bachhali Khurd, P.0. Bhaisajhar, Tah. Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

-- Petitioners

Versus

1. Union of India through the Chief Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, New Delhi.

2. State of Chhattisgarh through Secretary, Department of School Education, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. State of Madhya Pradesh through the Secretary, Department of School Education, VaIIabh Bhawan, Bhopal, MadhyaPradesh.

4. Commissioner of Public Instruction, Government of Chhattisgarh, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Deputy Director of Educati.on, District Education Office, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

-- Respondents 1»'!IF» For the Petitioners :

None.

Forthe Respondent/State:

ShriAshish Surana, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'bie Shri Jus.tice Pritinker Diwaker Order on Board 31/08/2016 1.

None appears on behalf of the Petitioners even when the case is taken up for hearing in third round.

2.

[n this circumstances, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution: ;

SdA f~ pritinl<er Diwaker Judge Khan