← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/406/2019allowed

Hojendra Kumar Verma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 406 of 2019

1. Hojendra Kumar Verma S/o Shri Jogiram Verma, Aged About 40 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat), And Posted At Govt. Middle School Rasmada (Sanlagna), Block Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

2. Ku. Manju Badhmar D/o Shri Samaylal Badhmar, Aged About 37 Years, Working As Lecturer Panchayat And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Khursuni, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.

--- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State :

Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 21.01.2019 Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in

this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, this petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 4.

No order as to costs.

Sd/-- P. Sam Koshy Judge vivek