High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/160/2018disposed off

Jayant Kumar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.160 of 2018 Jayant Kumar S/o Satyanarayan Aged About 19 Years R/o Girari, Post Amarpur, Tahsil Pendra, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Industrial Training And Manpower Planning, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Joint Director, Industrial Training Institute, Regional Office, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Principal, Government Industrial Training Institute, Gourela, District Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Urdu Education Board, Government Recognized Minority Board (Declared By National Commission Of Ministry Educational Institutions, Government Of India) (A Statutory Body Of Government Of India Under Parliament Act, 2004), Through Its Authorized Authority.

5. Rambai Sanskrit School (Under Annapurna Shiksha Vikash Samiti) Village And Post- Chouri (Budwa), Thana- Devlod), Tahsil Beohari, Shahdol (Madhya Pradesh) 484774, Through Its Authorized Authority, District : Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh --- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Mishra, Advocate For State : Mr. B.Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/01/2018 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's class-10th mark-sheet is duly recognized by Government of India, which has not been considered and decided by respondent No.3, against which this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed.

(2) Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make representation to the respondent No.3 for redressal of his grievance. If such representation is filed by the petitioner to the respondent No.3, in that event respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the same after making enquiry in accordance with law expeditiously from the date of filing of such the representation.

(3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to costs.

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-