Bimla Gupta v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 741 of 2018 Bimla Gupta W/o Shri Laxman Gupta Aged About 35 Years Presently Working As Teacher , Shishu Kendra , Sarnapara Block Pratapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Women And Child Develoment Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Director , Department Of Women And Child Development Indravati Bhawan Mantralaya Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. District Women And Child Development Officer , Surgajpur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :
Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For State :
Mr. Majid Ali, Dy. GA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 22/01/2018 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Teacher in Shishu Shiksha Kendra, Sarnapara, Block Pratappur, District Surguja. Further, from March 2016 onwards, she is not being paid honorarium of Rs.400/ per month.
2.
Considering the limited nature of relief claimed in the petition, it Is deemed appropriate that on petitioner's submitting representation within a period of 15 days from today, the respondent No.3 shall consider and decide the petitioner's representation regarding claim for honorarium within a period of two months from the date of submission of representation. 3.
The writ petition stands disposed of.
4.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Rohit