High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4304/2009infructuous

Satyendra Kumar Mehar And ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2015-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 4304 of 2009

1. Satyendra Kumar Mehar S/o Late Shri M.M. Mehar, aged about 43 years working as Assistant Grade III, Revenue Department District Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campus Raigarh Dist. Raigarh (C.G.)

2. Fakir Mohan Shadangi S/o Late Shri B.P. Shadangi, Working As Assistant Grade III, Revenue Department Distt. Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campus, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

3. Smt. Gauri Shrivastava W/o Shri Ravi Khare, Working As Assistant Grade III, Revenue Department, Distt. Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campus Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

4. Ramdayal Patel S/o Shri Champat Ram Patel, Working As Assistant Grade III, Revenue Department Distt. Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campurs Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

5. Parmeshwar Patel S/o Shri Chhattar Singh Patel, Working As Assistant Grade III, Revnue Department Distt. Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campus Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

6. R.K. Sawarnkar S/o Late Shri Sita Ram Sawarnkar, Working As Assistant Grade III, Revenue Department Distt. Office Raigarh, Collectorate Campus Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary/under Secretary, Revenue Department Mantralaya D.K.S. Bhawan Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Commissioner Revenue, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.)

3. The Collector, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)

4. Shri Durbadal Pradhan Working As Assistant Grade-2, Tahsil Office Revenue Department, Pathalgaon Distt. Jashpur (C.G.)

5. Ku. Padma Dewangan Working As Assistant Grade-3, Distt. Office Revenue Department Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.)

6. Smt. Neelam Singh, Working As Assistant Grade-3, Distt. Office Revenue Department Jashpur, Distt. Jashpur (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondent No.1-3/State :

Shri Bhupendra Singh, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.4 :

Shri Roop Naik, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 11/09/2015

1. Counsel for the Petitioners submits that with the influx of time the Petition has become infructuous.

2. The Petition is dismissed as has become infructuous. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge kishore