← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/664/2021disposed off

Dushyant Kumar Kaushik v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-02-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 664 of 2021

1. Dushyant Kumar Kaushik S/o Laxmi Prasad Kaushik, Aged About 51 Years, Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government High School, Polampulli, Block Konta, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh)

2. Smt. Kamlesh Kaushik W/o Dushyant Kumar Kaushik, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Lecturer (L.B.) At Government High School, Polampulli, Block Konta, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Sukma, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh)

4. Block Education Officer, Konta, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Konta, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Mr. Govind Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 17.02.2021

1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have in the present writ

petition is the non-granting of salary for the month of November, 2016.

2. According to the petitioners, though they had on leave from 15.10.2016 to 12.11.2016 yet they have not been paid salary for the said period. According to the petitioners, there was sufficient leave available in their credit and there is no reason why the salary should not be paid to the petitioners for the said period.

3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioners have, the writ petition at this juncture stands disposed of directing the respondents 3 & 4 to consider the claim of the petitioners so far as the unpaid salary for the month of November, 2016 is concerned. Let an appropriate decision be take at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai