High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/781/2018disposed off

Vijay Kumar Jogi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 781 of 2018 Vijay Kumar Jogi S/o Shri Babulal Jogi, Aged About 40 Years Presently Working As Lecturer Panchayat At Government High School, Bagharra, Block Pandariya, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham (Chhattisgarh), District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri CJK Rao, Advocate For State :

Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate S.B. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/01/2018 Heard.

1. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the respondents, whereby the increment granted to the petitioner is being withdrawn on the ground that he has not passed B. Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant

-2Kumar Patle vs. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions, vide order dated 03-11-2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned State counsel would submit that the petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 0311-2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed off with a direction to the respondents for examination of petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and take appropriate decision thereon.

Sd/-- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen