High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/490/2019disposed off

Tridev Navrange v. State Of Chattisgarh

2019-01-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 490 of 2019 Tridev Navrange S/o Kanhaiya Navrange, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Pausari, Post Bijradih, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Atal Nagar, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Bhatapara, District Baldoabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Anand Kumar Verma S/o Uttara Kumar Verma, Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Pausari, Post - Bijradih, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 24/01/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P1 dated 13.12.2018. By the said order, the services of the petitioner have been terminated. The termination is on the ground that the petitioner has obtained employment based on fake experience certificate.

-22. Prima facie, this Court is not inclined to entertain the writ petition for the reason that there is an efficacious alternative statutory remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. The appeal against the said order would be to the Collector.

3. From the record it appears that the petitioner has not availed the remedy of appeal and has straightaway filed the writ petition. Reserving the right of the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appellate authority within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, the writ petition stands disposed of. In case the appeal is preferred, the appellate authority in turn shall ignoring the aspect of limitation if any decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 60 days thereafter.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai