Ram Kumar Pathak v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

in"* i •^1'1 • Q

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR.IC.GI

W.P. No.

72005 Ram Kumar Pathak, S/o (Lafe) Shri Suraj Narayan PETITIONER:

^s-^y ^5S^>;

fl t'

Pathak, R/o Quarter No. G-4, Model School Colony, Jashpur .^.

~..^"Q • es^,;;.-;-oy ^••"5\*

VERSUS

(Chhattisgarh) State of Chhattisgarh RESPONDENTS:

Through Secretary, SC-St-OBC-Minorities Welfare Department, Mantralaya, DKS Bhavan, RaipurfC.G.) /'^^^"^^ ^yw>y^ .^^6"

/ Commissioner, Tribal and SC Welfare (Chhattisgarh), Pt.Ravishankar University Campus, Raipur, C.G.

Commissioner, Tribal Welfare (Madhya Pradesh), ^:'.'1^".-^ Bhopal (M.P.) ^ 4.

Divisional Deputy Commissioner, Tribal Welfare (Jabalpur Division), Jabalpur, M.P.

c?

5.

Assistant Commissioner Tribal Welfare, Jashpur (C.G) 6.

Collector, Jashpur, (C.G.) c"'

7.

Principal, '..

Government Model Higher «. Secondary School, Jashpur (C.G.) PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIArQR^ISSUANCE OF APPROPRIATE WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND CERTIORARI AND FOR OTHER SUITABLE WRITS AND DIRECTIONS:- ra'T^'vaup^D i

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR WP No. 408of 2005 Ram Kumar Pathak -- Petitioner

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

--Respondent For Petitioner : Shri Aditya Tiwari, Advocate.

For RespondenVState : ShriYS Thakur, DeputyAG.

For Respondents 3 & 4 : Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 22/04/2016 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux oftime.

2. The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Sdfprashant Kumar Mishra Judge Barve