Parag Yadav And Another v. Kaveri Mishra And Others

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (227) No.1600 of 2010

1. Parag Yadav, aged about 29 years, wife of Shri Anil Yadav, R/o through Tiharu Yadav, Police Sub Inspector, Police Station Torva, Place of residence Near Rahul Dhaba, "Anas Niwas" Rajkishore Nagar, Bilaspur and through husband Anil Yadav, Assistant Loco Pilot South East Railway, Khadagpur (West Bengal and "Maini Bada" Mainipara, Khadagpur, West Bengal (Phone No. of House Owner 9434192814.

2. Anil Yadav, aged about 31 years, son of Shri Tiharu Yadav in side of Garden City Rajkishore Nagar, Mopka at present posted as Assistant Loco Pilot South East Railway, Khadagpur (West Bengal), R/o "Maiti Bada" Mainipara, West Bengal (Phone No. of house owner 9434192814).

---- Petitioners

Versus

1.

Smt. Kaveri Mishra, aged about 55 years, wife of Sheetal Prasad Mishra, R/o Village and Post Mangla, Bilaspur, Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG).

2.

Ashish Tiwari, aged about 38 years, son of Shri Veer Govind Tiwari.

3.

Nikhilesh Tiwari, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Veergovind Tiwari, Shivaji Marg Tikrapara (near Mundra Kirana Stores), Bilaspur Tahsil and District Bilaspur (CG).

4.

Milan Jana.

5.

Jharkhande Lal.

6.

Shanker Jana.

7.

K.P. Choudhari.

8.

Ashok Singh.

9.

G.C. Maine.

10.

Gyani Saab.

11.

Akram.

12.

Munna Singh.

13.

Aaftab Singh.

14.

Loha Prasad.

15.

Ved Prasad Paruwar, son of Shri Padumlal Paruwar, aged about 19 years.

16.

Smt.Usha Devi Paruwar, aged about 39 years, wife of Shri Padumlal Paruwar, R/o Biditdeshwar Awasiya Parisar, Sarkanda Bilaspur.

17.

Shiv Kumar Agrawal, aged about 35 years, son of Shri Mohanlal Agrawal, R/o Torwa, Bilaspur (CG).

Respondents No.4 to 17 are Living In Rooms Constructed In The Suit Land On Rent Situated At Village Seepat, Tahsil Masturi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG).

---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Ravindra Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 03/10/2016 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the instant petition has become infructuous.

(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-