High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/483/2020disposed off

Prakash Chand Shukla v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 483 of 2020 • Prakash Chand Shukla S/o Shri Sanjay Prasad Shukla, Aged About 50 Years Presently Posted As Chief Municipal Officer At Municipal Council Sheorinarayan, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh) R/o. Jorapara Sarkanda, Near Alankar Bhawan, Bilaspur P.S. Sarkanda Tehsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate, Urban Administration And Development, Indravati Bhawan, 4th Floor, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Council Akaltara, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Priyank Rathi, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 3 :

Ms. M. Asha, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 22/01/ 2020

1. The petitioner contends that by order dated 15.01.2020 the petitioner who was working as In-charge Chief Municipal Officer, Sheorinarayan, district Janjgir has been directed to placed as Revenue Sub-Inspector at Municipal Council, Akaltara. The remark column states that the placement to the substantive post.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner while was posted at n-charge Chief Municipal Officer, Sheorinarayan for the last 10 years and he has been working as incharge Chief Municipal Officer at

various Municipal Councils though, he was entitled for promotion instead of being promoted the petitioner is being sent back to the post of Revenue Sub-Inspector at Municipal Council, Akaltara i.e. the substantive post of which the petitioner is in hold. The petitioner further contends that the petitioner has filed the representation with the Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development (Respondent No.1 ) that may be directed to be decided.

3. Considering the fact that the petitioner as has been stated was discharging the job of Chief Medical Officer for the last 10 years and the petitioner as already filed a representation (Annexure P-2), it is directed that Respondent No. 1 shall decide the same within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Jyoti