← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/470/2019disposed off

Siyaram Nareti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 470 of 2019 Siyaram Nareti S/o Shri Hariram, Aged About 33 Years, Presently Working As Assistant Constable, Police Station Rajhara, Tahsil Doundi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Near Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Additional Director General Of Police (Planing And Provision), Police Headquarter, Block No. 04, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Superintendent Of Police, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For petitioner :

Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/01/2019.

1.

The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in the instant Writ Petition is that, the State Government has recently enhanced the salary of the Assistant Constables from Rs. 3,500/- to Rs. 4,300/-. This enhancement of salary has been implemented in the other districts by the respondents, but at the place where the petitioner is posted, the said benefits has not been extended.

2.

Perusal of record would show that, but for the petitioner, other Assistant Constables have made representation in this regard, but no final decision has been taken by the State authorities.

3.

Given the aforesaid factual matrix of the case and there being no dispute so far the enhancement of salary of Assistant Constables made by the respondents, let the petitioner also make a detailed representation to the respondent No.2 within a period of 10 days from today. That the respondent No.2 in turn on due verification take a decision on the representation and decide as to why the said benefit is not being extended to the petitioner and the other similarly persons posted at District, Balod/Gariyaband/Dhamtari. 4.

While taking a decision, the authorities would take note of the decision of the State Government dated 29/10/2015 in this regard. 5.

Let this exercise be done within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner.

6.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE