← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6675/2014disposed off

Jageshwar Prasad Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

2018-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6675 of 2014 Jageshwar Prasad Soni, S/o Late Shri Jagannath Prasad Soni, aged about 65 years, Occupation Retired Male Nurse, Police Hospital Urdana, Raigarh, R/o Old Urdana Barrier, Urdana Square, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Secretary, Home Affairs, Department of Police, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

3. The Director General of Police, Police Head Quarters, District Raipur (C.G.)

4. The Superintendent of Police, Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner:

Mr. Prakash Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondents/State: Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 23/01/2018

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for third advance increment from 6-2-1981 to 31-1-2010 with all consequential benefits in light of orders dated 5-1-2008 and 20-112008, but that has not been considered and granted. He further submits that similarly situated employees have been extended the benefit which has been seriously opposed by Mr. Sao, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing for the State/ respondents. He also submits that the petitioner may be allowed to submit a fresh

representation in this regard.

3. The prayer is fair and reasonable.

4. Be that as it may, if a fresh representation is made by the petitioner before respondents No.1 to 3, they will take decision in the matter within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Soma