High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/514/2020disposed off

Mahesh Singh Mandavi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 514 of 2020 • Mahesh Singh Mandavi S/o Shri Harishankar Mandavi Aged About 58 Years Presently Working As Veterinary Assistant Surgeon, Balod At Office Of Dy. Director, Veterinary Services, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Livestock Development, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Veterinary Services, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Dy. Director Vetenary Service, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 23.01.2020

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is entitled for Kramonnati as per circulars dated 19.04.1999, 28.04.2008, 03.10.2008 and 11.01.2010 after completion of 16 years of service. He submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in the matter of R.S. Verma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others (W.P.(S) No.2805/2002 by judgment and order dated 29.08.2006. He further submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to make a representation to consider

the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of State of Tripura and Others Vs. K.K. Roy (2004 SCW/1) and the order passed in R.S. Verma (supra) top which learned counsel for the respondent/State has no objection.

3. Accordingly, the liberty sought for by the petitioner is granted to make a representation before the concerned authority. It is expected from the competent authority subject to verification decide the representation of the petitioner as expeditiously as possible in an objective manner preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. In view of above, the petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Yasmin