← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/654/2019disposed off

Malik Ram Yadu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 654 of 2019 Malik Ram Yadu S/o Dandi Ram, Aged About 57 Years, Posted As Peon (Confidential Section), Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary State Of Chhattisgarh, General Administration Department , Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Registrar Pandit Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sumit Singh Rathore under instruction of Ms. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate For State/respondents 1 to 3 :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 31/01/2019

1. The limited relief which the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for regularization.

2. According to the petitioner, he has been working as a daily wage employee since 1993, as such he has put in about 25 years of service but till date the petitioner has not been considered for regularization. It is also the contention of the Counsel for the petitioner that there are

-2regular vacancies available and that the petitioner is discharging the duties of sanctioned vacant post.

3. Given the aforesaid factual matrix, as has been stated by the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed off at the admission stage, directing the respondent no. 4 to take a decision on the claim of the petitioner for regularization in accordance with the rules and regulations governing the field of regularization.

4. Let this exercise be completed within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise respondent no. 4 so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Harneet