High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/486/2019disposed off

Mrs. Tukeshwari Kanwar v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-01-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 486 of 2019 Mrs. Tukeshwari Kanwar W/o Mr. Bhaypal Singh Kanwar, Aged About 32 Years, By Occupation Lecturer Local Body, Govt. H.S.S. Kochbay, Block Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner Cum Director, Panchayat, Sanchanalaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Exectutive Officer, Zila Panchayat, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, P. L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 24.01.2019

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Respondents, whereby the petitioner has not been granted the increment on the ground that she has not passed B.Ed/D. Ed examination.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the issue with regard to withdrawal/non-grant of increment on the ground of having not

passed B.Ed/D.Ed examination was examined by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle v. State of Chhattisgarh (WPS No.4271 of 2017 and batch of petitions vide order dated 03.11.2017) and various directions have been issued for affording proper opportunity of hearing and then decide the matter.

3. Learned Counsel for the State submits that the Petitioner's claim would be examined after affording opportunity of hearing in terms of order dated 03.11.2017 passed in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra).

4. Considering the aforesaid submission, this petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the Respondents for examination of Petitioner's claim in terms of order passed by this Court in the case of Jayant Kumar Patle (supra) and to take appropriate decision thereon subject to her completing the requisite length of service.

5. The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge JYOTI