Shambhu Nath Painkara v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 498 of 2019 Shambhu Nath Painkara S/o Shri R. K. Singh Sengar, Aged About 41 Years, Working As Lecturer (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Hr. Sec. School Bargidih, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administrative And Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Ambikapur, Surguja, Chhattisgarh.

4. Commissoner Municipal Corporation Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Mishra, Advocate For respondent No. 4 :

Mr. Bhupendra Singh, Advocate For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 24/01/2019

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the claim of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another)", but the petitioner had not completed the required 8 years of service for claiming the said benefits.

2. Given the aforesaid factual matrix, let the petitioner approach the authorities concerned, for the relief sought for, after due competition of the minimum period required, and thereafter if the authorities do not grant the relief, the petitioner would have the remedy of approaching this Court.

-23. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Harneet