High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/746/2020disposed off

Smt. Vidya Kulkarni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-02-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 746 of 2020 Smt. Vidya Kulkarni, W/o. Shri Vinay Kulkarni, Aged About 63 Years, Sewanivarit Pradhan Adhayapika, Niwasi Chitrakutroad Jagdalpur, Jila Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Sachiv, School Shiksha Vibhag, Chhattisgarh Shasan, Naya Raipur, Jila Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Sachiv, Adiwasi Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Jila Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Jila Shiksha Adhikari, Karyalay Jila Shiksha Adhikari, Jagdalpur, Jila Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

4. Khand Shiksha Adhikari, Vikaskhand Jagdalpur, Jila Bastar, Chhattisgarh.

5. Sambhagiya Sanyukt Sanchalak, Kosh Lekha Avam Pension Bastar Sambhag, Jagdalpur, Jila Bastar Chhattisgarh.

6. Jila Koshalay Adhikari Jagdalpur, Jila Bastar Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. C.P. Soni, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Mr. Priyank Rathi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 03.02.2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has been retired on 30.11.2018, thereafter, all the documents and papers for payment of the pension and retiral dues are forwarded but the respondent is not taking any decision. Thereby, the interim pension which was to be paid to the petitioner has not been released.

2. It is contended that for the intermediate period for some interim pension was paid, however, despite all correspondences has been made, the

retiremental dues has not been made. It is further contended that the petitioner has made a representation before the Respondent No.4 to send all the necessary papers, however, the same is not decided.

3. This fact is also not disputed and all the documents would show that the petitioner is a retired employee. The Annexure-P1 is annexed herewith, which is the order for payment of pension and the retiral dues, which is unfortunate. Despite the petitioner has been retired as a teacher, his retiral dues are not supplied.

4. Though the petitioner has been retired in the year 2018, considering the plight of the petitioner, the respondents are directed to decide the entitlement of the retiral dues of the petitioner which include the payment of pension and shall release the same within a period of 45 days, from the date of receipt of this order.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge ashok