← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/10/2018disposed off

Anuj Kumar Mishra v. Union Of India

2018-08-31Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPPIL No. 10 of 2018 • Anuj Kumar Mishra S/o Harishankar Mishra, Aged About 28 Years R/o House No. 17, Ward No. 6, Railway Colony, Village/post/police Station Mandir Hasaud, Tehsil Aarang, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

Union of India Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Government Of India, New Delhi.

2.

Sout Eastern Central Railways, Through Divisional Railway Manager, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Senior Divisional Engineer (Works) WRS, SECR, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), 4.

Sub Divisional Engineer (Works) WRS, SECR District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 5.

Senior Divisional Engineer (Coordination), SECR, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6.

Divisional Engineer Coordination (II), SECR, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 7.

Assistant Divisional Engineer (II), SECR, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 8.

Station House Officer, Railway Protection Force, WRS, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 9.

Station House Officer, Police Station Mandir Hasaud, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 10.

Senior Divisional Engineer (Electric General), WRS, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents __________________________________________________________________ For Petitioner :

Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent-UNI :

Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Assistant Solicitor General For Respondent-State :

Shri Y.S. Thakur, Additional Advocate General For Respondent-SECR :

Shri Abhishek Sinha, Standing Counsel ___________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per, Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 31.08.2018 1.

Notices have been issued to the individuals who are in illegal occupation of Railway property. Those notices are also on record.

2.

Since the law has been set in motion, the same cannot be derailed or diluted by entertaining a PIL against such an action. There is adequate remedy available to the Noticees and they can take appropriate steps for defending their right if they have one in the very first place. 3.

The PIL stands disposed off.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Sanjay Agrawal) Chief Justice Judge Chandra