Sharad Kumar Mahobe v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 615 of 2019 Sharad Kumar Mahobe S/o Shri R L Mahobe, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Lecturer (L B) And posted at Govt. High School Bodtara, Block Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. J.P. Mathur, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashtha Sukla, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30/01/2019

1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that though the claim of the petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another)", but the petitioner had not completed the required 8 years of service for claiming the said benefits.

2. Given the aforesaid factual matrix, let the petitioner approach the authorities concerned, for the relief sought for, after due completion of the minimum period required, and thereafter if the authorities do not grant the relief, the petitioner would have the remedy of approaching this Court.

-23. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/-- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge vivek