High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/704/2020disposed off

Mukesh Kumar Jain v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 704 of 2020 Mukesh Kumar Jain S/o Rupchand Jain, Aged About 65 Years R/o New Adarsh Nagar, Plot No. 4, Street 1D, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Co-Operative Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

2. Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, Chhattisgarh Block-3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

3. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Co-Operative Bank Maryadit (Apex Bank), Sahkar Bhawan, Sector-24, Plot No. 76, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh,

4. Divisional Manager (Pension/ Group Insurance), Life Insurance Corporation Regional Office Pandri, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents/ State :

Shri Kunal Das, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 31-01-2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner after amalgamation of C.G. State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank and C.G. State Co-Operative Bank, rendered his services as Assistant General Manager from 07.10.2014 and eventually he retired on 30.09.2016 from the post of AGM. It is contended that after his retirement he is given pension of Rs. 8,000/- whereas for the person holding the post of AGM in the Bank are entitled to pension of Rs. 12,000/- and one W.R. Nande is being paid the likewise pension of Rs. 12,000/-. The petitioner contended that he is subjected to discrimination. At this stage the petitioner prays that he has

made a representation (Annexure P-5) to Respondent No. 3 which may be decided so that the petitioner may be paid Rs. 12,000/- p.m.

2. Considering the prayer at this stage Respondent No. 3 to whom the representation (Annexure P-5) is made, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner with respect to payment of pension within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and if the petitioner is entitled for higher pension the same may be paid to him.

3. With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Rao