← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/962/2018disposed off

Goverdhan Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 962 of 2018 Goverdhan Patel S/o Shri Prem Sai Patel, Aged About 59 Years, Lecturer, Posted In Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bagindih, Block- Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Civil And Revenue District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director, School Education Department, Indrawati Bhawan New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. District Education Officer, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer, Block- Baramkela, Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

5. The Principal Government High School Bade Navapara, Block- Baramkela, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate.

For Respondents/ State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 30/01/18 1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made representation before the respondent No. 2 to grant two advance annual increments, but the same has not been considered and decide till this date and, therefore, directions may be issued to the respondent No. 2 to decide the same expeditiously. 2.

On the other hand, Ms. Sunita Jain, learned counsel appearing on

behalf of respondents would oppose the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and would submit that the petitioner is not entitled for two advance increments.

3.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 4.

Be that as it may, the respondent No. 2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka