Madarsha Gulshane Jehra, v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 202 of 2018 Madarsha Gulshane Jehra, Sanjay Nagar, Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker, through its President - Haji Mohammad Ishhaq Rijvi, S/o Late Sattar Bhai, aged about 60 years, R/o behind the Maszid Mahadev Ward, Kanker, District North Bastar, Kanker (C.G.) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, District Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Director, Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Mantralaya, District Raipur (C.G.)
3. The Chief Executive Officer, C.G. Rajya Waqf Board, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.)
4. The C.G. Madarsha Board, through its Secretary, Old Police Head Quarter Parisar, Nea Rajbhawan, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)
5. The Collector, North Bastar Kanker, District Kanker (C.G.)
6. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue), Kanker, District Kanker, C.G.
7. The District Education Officer, North Bastar Kanker, District Kanker, C.G.
8. The Block Education Officer, North Bastar Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.)
9. The Anjuman Islamiya Committee Kanker, through its Sadar, Anjuman Islamiya Committee Kanker, District North Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondents :
Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate.
For State :
Mr. Ashish Surana, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/01/18 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that against the order dated 13.09.2017 (Annexure- P/4) passed by respondent No. 7 cancelling
the registration of the petitioner's society, petitioner has preferred an appeal before the State Government which is pending consideration since 31.10.2017 and has not been decided till date. 2.
Be that as it may, the Appellate Authority is directed to consider and decide the petitioner's appeal after hearing the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner would also be at liberty to press the application for interim relief pending before respondent No. 3. 3.
Upon receipt of copy of this order, the learned Appellate Authority is directed to expedite the hearing of the appeal and the application for interim relief pending before respondent No. 3 shall be heard within a period of one week from today.
4.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka