High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP/150/2000disposed off

Dina Nath Yadav v. Beekay Engineering Corporation And ORS.

2016-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

^ NAFR HIGH COURTOF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR Writ Petition No. 150 of 2000 Shri Dina Nath Yadav, S/o Shri Sita Ram Yadav, aged 41 years, C/o Kashyap Kirana Stores, Near Rashtriya Vidyalaya, Baikunt Nagar, Camp-11, Bhilai, Distt. Durg, Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) -490 001.

-- Petitioner

Versus

1. Beekay Engineering Corporation, 45/47, Industrial Estate, Bhilai(M.P.)(nowC.G.)

2. Industrial Court, Bench Raipur, Krishna Sadan, HIG, Shankar Nagar, Raipur.

3. State of Madhya Pradesh (now State of Chhattisgarh), Through the Secretary, Department of Labour, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal.

-- Respondents AND Writ Petition No.600 of 2000 Surendra Tiwari, S/o Shri Markhande Tiwari, aged about 41 years, R/o Baikunth Nagar, Camp-2, Bhilai, Distt. Durg. -- Petitioner

Versus

1. The General Manager, Beekay Engineering Corporation, 45/47, Industrial Estate, Bhilai, Distt. Durg.

2. Member Judge, Industrial Court, Bench Raipur, Distt. Raipur. -- Respondents For Petitioners:

. Mr. P.R. Patankar, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Saniav K. Aarawal Order_On_Board 14/09/2016

1. The Lqbour Court passed an award dated 16-10-1999 r"

N«"

W^A

u deciding Reference Petition No.9/MPIR Act/96 (General Secretary, Pragatisheel Engineering Shramik Sangh v. B.K. Engineering Corporation) against which B.K.

Engineering Corporation filed W.P.No.4927/1999 as well as the Union filed W.P.No.74/2000.

In the said reference, the present petitioners both were employees.

W.P.No.4927/1S99 has been allowed in part whereas W.P.No.74/2000 has been dismissed completely.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the appeal preferred on behalf ofthe employees by the Union has already been dismissed and thewrit petition preferred by B.K. Engineering Corporation has already been allowed, these writ petitions be disposed in terms of the order dated 11-5-2016 passed in the aforesaid writ petitions.

3. The prayer is fair and reasonable.

4. Both the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order dated 11-5-2016 passed in W.P.No.74/2000.

No order as to costs.

5. A copy of the order dated 11-5-2016 passed in W.P.

No.74/2000 be made part ofthis order.

Sd/- Sanjay K. Agrawal Judge Soma