Smt. Manisha Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 528 of 2019

1. Smt. Manisha Sharma W/o Rakesh Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhaisbod, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh.

2. Tejram Yadav S/o Kunwar Singh Yadav, Aged About 39 Years, Working As Teacher (LB), Govt. Middle School, Pendravan, Block Dhamdha, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh.

3. Ku. Chandralekha D/o Bhanvar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhaisbod, Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh.

4. Ashwani Kumar Kurre S/o Asharam Kurre, Aged About 45 Years, Working As Lecturer (LB). Govt. Higher Secondary School, Limtara, Block Dhamdha, District -Durg, Chhattisgarh.

5. Shweta Pandey W/o Sandeep Pandey, Aged About 43 Years, Working As Lecture Panchayat Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bhimbhauri, Block Berla, District- Bemetara Chhattisgarh.

6. Pramod Kumar Pal S/o Shravan Kumar Pal, Aged About 33 Years, Working As Assistant Teacher (LB), Govt. Primary School, Bhatapara (Godhi), Block Dhamdha, District -Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Commissioner - Cum - Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District -Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Durg, District -Durg, Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Balod, District-Balod, Chhattisgarh.

6. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Bemetara District- Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For petitioners :

Shri G.P.Mathur, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Syed Majid Ali, Dy.GA.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/01/2019

1.

Learned Counsel for the parties submits that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by the order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions, wherein allowing the petitions, the circular dated 23.4.2016 has been quashed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission, since the impugned order or action is based on circular dated 23.4.2016 which stands quashed in the case referred above, the present writ petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioners shall also be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

The writ petition thus stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) vivek JUDGE