← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/899/2019allowed

Arnim Veerendra Minj v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-03-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 899 of 2019 Arnim Veerendra Minj S/o Devonish Minj Aged About 34 Years R/o Rishali Sector Bhilai, Police Station- Newai, Tahsil And District- Durg, CG ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station- Newai, Civil And Revenue District- Durg, CG ---- Respondent For applicant Mr. R.V. Rajwade, Adv.

For non-applicant/State Mr. Vikram Dixit, GA.

For objector Mr. T.K. Tiwari, Adv.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board 14-31. This is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and his no bail application is pending before any other court.

2. The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 82/2018 registered in police station Newai, Distt. Durg (CG) for offence punishable under Section 420,406/34 of the IPC.

3. Prosecution story in brief is that applicant, co-accused Nirmala Jagrani and Arun Vinod Minj had taken loan of a sum of Rs. 6,31,000/- from complainant Peetarpal on 30-5-2017 for performing marriage of applicant subject to condition that they will return back the said amount within a month. An agreement was also executed. They did not return the said amount to complainant. Later, applicant had given an e-payment slip to the complainant about transfer of Rs. 6,31,000/- to the account of the complainant. When complainant checked the entries of his account, it was found that no amount was transferred in his account. Later on he came to know that the said e-payment slip was fake.

4. Counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated hence he be released on bail.

5. On the other hand, the State Counsel opposed the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedent has been reported against applicant in the police case diary.

6. Looking to the above facts and circumstances of the case, as the trial will take its own time, the application is allowed. It is ordered that if the applicant furnishes two solvent sureties each for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned with the condition that he will not involve himself in any of the crime in future, he be released on bail.

7. CC as per rules.

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge Pathak