Ram Lal Shrivastav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet MCC No. 66 of 2020 Ram Lal Shrivastav, S/o. Late Mahavir Prasad, Aged About 66 Years, Retired Spot Assistant, R/o. Ravanbhata, Kumharpara, Ward No.18, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Kasdol, District Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Balar Nahar Sub-Division, Kasdol, District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

4. The Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents 29.01.2020 Mr. K.P.Sahu, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer for the State. Heard The instant MCC is filed on the ground that on the earlier occasion in WPS No.10259 of 2019, the address of the respondent No.2 & 3 were wrongly written, as it pertains to District Mahsamund; whereas it was shown as District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, therefore, the same may be corrected in the order dated 06.12.2019.

Considering the averments, the respondent No.2 & 3 as shown in para No.4 of the MCC be read as under :

"2.

The Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 3.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Kodar Nahar, Sub Division-1, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh." Accordingly, in the order dated 06.12.2019 passed in WPS No.10259 of 2019, the respondent No.2 & 3 be read as above. The rest of the order dated 06.12.2019 shall remain as it is. In view of the above, the MCC is allowed.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge ashok